BEFORE YOU READ THE ABSTRACT OR CHAPTER ONE OF THE PROJECT TOPIC BELOW, PLEASE READ THE INFORMATION BELOW.THANK YOU!
INFORMATION:
YOU CAN GET THE COMPLETE PROJECT OF THE TOPIC BELOW. THE FULL PROJECT COSTS N5,000 ONLY. THE FULL INFORMATION ON HOW TO PAY AND GET THE COMPLETE PROJECT IS AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE. OR YOU CAN CALL: 08068231953, 08168759420
WHATSAPP US ON 08137701720
ARMED FORCES IN PEACE SUPPORT OPERATIONS: CHALLENGES AND PROSPECTS FOR NIGERIAN ARMY PERSONNEL
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGES (S)
Title Page – – – – – – – – – i
Certification- – – – – – – – – ii
Dedication – – – – – – – – – iii
Acknowledgement – – – – – – – iv
Table of Contents – – – – – – – vii
List of Tables – – – – – – – – x
List of Figures – – – – – – – – xi
List of Abbreviation – – – – – – – xii
Abstract – – – – – – – – – xiv
Glossary of Terms – – – – – – – xv
CHAPTER ONE: Introduction
1.1 Background to the Study – – – – 1
1.2 Statement of the Problem – – – – 4
1.3 Objectives of the Study – – – – – – 5
1.4 Research Assumptions – – – – – – 5
1.5 Significance of the Study – – – – – 5
1.6 Scope of the Study – – – – – – 6
1.7 Limitations of the Study – – – – – 7
CHAPTER TWO: Literature Review
2.1 Introduction – – – – – – – 8
2.2 Concept of Peace Support Operations – – – 8
2.3 Spectrum of Peace Support Operations – – – 10
2.4 Military Capacity in Peace Support Operations – 16
2.5 Principles of Peace Support Operations – – – – 17
2.6 Summary – – – – – – – – 19
CHAPTER THREE: Research Methodology
3.1 Introduction – – – – – – – 21
3.2 Research Design – – – – – – – 21
3.3 Identifying the Variables – – – – – 22
3.3 Area of Study – – – – – – – 22
3.4 Population – – – – – – – – 22
3.5 Instruments of Data Collection – – – 23
3.6 Validations of Instruments – – – – – 23
3.7 Methods of Data Collection and Analysis – – – – 24
3.8 Weakness of the Methodology – – – – 24
3.9 Summary – – – – – – – – – 25
CHAPTER FOUR: Data Presentation Analysis and Findings
4.1 Introduction – – – – – – – 26
4.2 Data Presentation – – – – – 27
4.3 Analysis/Interpretation of Data – – – – 34
4.4 Relationship between the Nigerian Army and Peace
Support Operations – – – – – 41
4.5 Prospects of Nigerian Army Personnel in Peace Support
Operations – – – – – – – 43
4.6 Prospects of Nigerian Army Personnel in Peace Support
Operations at Global level – – – – 44
4.7 The Way Forward for Nigerian Army in Peace Support
Operations – – – – – – – 46
4.8 Summary – – – – – – – 50
CHAPTER FIVE: Conclusion and Recommendations
5.1 Conclusion – – – – – – – – 21
5.2 Recommendations – – – – – 53
References – – – – – – – – 54
Appendix
LIST OF TABLES
| Serial | Titles of Tables | Page No (s) |
| 1. 2. 3. 4. | Distribution of Respondent by location of personnel. Distribution of Respondents by categories. Respondents Responses on the challenges to Nigerian Army Personnel in Peace Support Operations. Response to IS there a Relationship between the Nigerian Army and Peace Support Operations. | 27 28 30 32 |
LIST OF FIGURES
| Serial | Titles of Figures | Page No (s) |
| 1. 2. 3. 4. | Pie Chart showing Distribution of Respondents by location of personnel. Bar Chart showing the Distribution of Respondents by categories. Bar Chart showing Respondents responses on the challenges to Nigerian Army Personnel in Peace Support Operations. Bar Chart showing response to IS there a relationship between Nigerian Army and Peace Support Operations. | 27 29 31 33 |
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
PSO – Peace Support Operations.
IPA – International Peace Academy.
UN – United Nations.
NA – Nigerian Army.
OAU – Organisation of African Unity.
ECOMOG – ECOWAS Monitoring Group.
UNAMID – United Nation Assistance Mission in Darfur.
ONUC – United Nation Operations in Congo.
UNIFIL – United Nation Interim Force in Lebanon.
DIA – Defence Intelligence Agency.
SSS – State Security Service.
AFM – Army Field Manual.
ECOWAS – Economic Community of West African States.
PKO – Peace Keeping Operations.
AHQ – Army Headquarters.
DHQ – Defence Headquarters.
AFCSC – Armed Forces Command and Staff College.
ICC – Infantry Corp and Centre.
NASI – Nigerian Army School of Infantry.
HQ 1 DIV – Headquarters 1 Division.
NAPKC – Nigerian Army Peace Keeping Centre.
AU – African Union.
UNAMSIL – United Nations Mission in Sierra Leone.
DPKO – Department of Peacekeeping Operations.
TCC – Troops of Peacekeeping Operations.
UNIIMOG – United Nations Iran-Iraq Monitoring Group.
UNIKOM – United Nations Iraq-Kuwait Observer Mission.
UNAVEM – United Nations Angola Verification Mission.
UNPROFOR- United Nations Protection Force.
UNOSOM – United Nations Mission in Somalia.
UNSC – United Nations Security Council.
OOTW – Operations Other than War.
NIBATT – Nigeria Battalion.
ABSTRACT
This study was carried out to examine the challenges and prospects of the Nigeria Army (NA) Personnel in Peace Support Operation (PSO). Nigeria being a member of United Nations (UN) has been involved in conflict resolution in the sub-region, region and global arena. Hence the NA has participated in many peacekeeping and PSOs since independence in 1960. Despite her contributions and acknowledgement by the international community, her participation has been fraught with problems especially in the areas of manpower, training and logistics. The study therefore, examined the causes of these inadequacies in order to recommend the best way to make PSOs more effective in the NA. The main objectives of the study is therefore, to identify what constitutes PSOs, examine the NA in PSOs, identify the challenges affecting the NA personnel in PSO, and also examine the prospects for the NA participation in future PSOs. The study relied on both primary and secondary sources of data. Primary data were collected and analysed through questionnaire. Secondary data were sourced from published and unpublished materials such as books and relevant papers presented at various fora. The study adopted both the descriptive and analytical methods of conducting research. The study adopted both qualitative and analytical methods of data analysis. It identified specific problems which included; inadequate manpower, training and logistics. Others are inadequate information management, language barrier and poor funding. The research found out that the conduct of PSOs has not been effective due to lack of inadequate logistics, training and doctrine. The study suggested way forward for NA personnel effective participation in future PSOs to include, education, training and computerization. It was recommended that Nigeria should continue to play the leading role of maintaining peace and security in West African sub-region, Africa and the world. Nigerian Government should provide adequate funds for the NA for procurement and maintenance of equipment and personnel. Lastly the DHQ should establish mission radio stations to enhance conduct of information warfare.
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
Peace Support Operations PSO is the use of multinational military, police and civilian personnel for prevention, containment and termination of crisis which the UN and other international organizations feel might threaten international peace and security.
Peace Making The art of settling disputes or conflicts through mediation arbitration and reconciliation.
Peace Enforcement The use of force against one or more parties to a conflict in a war situation by a multinational force. It embraces conflict suppression.
Peace Building A positive, continuous cooperative human endeavour to build bridges between conflicting nations and groups.
Peace Keeping The prevention, containment, moderation, and termination of hostilities, through the medium of peaceful third party intervention organized and directed internationally using multinational forces of soldiers and civilians to restore and maintain order.
Preventive Action Actions taken to prevent existing disputes from escalating into conflict and to limit the spread of the latter when they occur.
Military All organized groups, regular and irregular, national and tribal, that use violence for political and social ends.
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND
The challenges to establish and maintain law, order, peace and security have preoccupied humanity since political communities emerged on the surface of earth. (Stedman, 1991). These have been occasioned by the manifestation of conflict as part of the feature of human relations. (Stedman, 1991).
The need for peace and security has been addressed with the creation of the state as a political community. The state has carried out this task through government and its institutions to keep in check the prosperity of man to express whatever disagreement there is through violence. This is done for the most part, through the restraining power of the law and sometimes through the use of force (Stedman, 1991).
At the level of relations among state where the same need for peace and security which has challenged them internally is found, the approach has been different State have had to employ common mechanism to deal with the problem of conflict. A most enduring framework is that of collective security which is expressed through Peace Supports Operation (PSO), (United Nations, 50 years of United Nations: Notes for Speakers (New York United Nations, 1995).
Dramatic events of the 1990s and the subsequent collapse of the Warsaw Pact heralded profound changes in the international security arena. With the collapse of Soviet Union, many nations’ armed forces have had to shift their institutional emphasis from fighting to maintaining stability and to prevent fighting. With it also comes the need for leaders and soldiers to participate extensively in operation designed to deter wars, resolve conflicts, promote peace and support civil authorities in respond to crisis (Azazi, 2009). Nigeria as a member of United Nations (UN) has been one of the leading countries that participated in PSOs in the world at large and Africa continent in particular. This is in attainment of one of her foreign policy objectives (United Nations, 1995).
The Nigerian Army (NA) has participated in UN peacekeeping missions where it was the third largest troop contributor after Bangladesh and India. Due to its adherence to and contributions for UN peace mission, Nigeria was voted into the UN security council (www.challengeforum.vet).
The election of Nigeria to African Union Peace and Security Council and her being made its first chairman in 2004, is a confirmation of her accomplishments and leadership roles. This is a confirmation of her achievement due to her involvement in all conflict resolution processes since the days of Organisations of African Union (OAU) (Akinrinade 2004).
NA personnel have operated with distinction in Africa within the framework of ECOWAS Monitoring Group (ECOMOG), a fact that is well known and accepted not only in the sub-region but in Africa and the world at large (Vogt, 1993). The Ivorian experience contrasts with those of Liberia and Sierra-Leone where Nigerian troops led peace operations which were very effective in restoring security and stability to the 2 countries.
Despite the above brilliant contributions of the NA to PSOs and its acknowledgement by the international community, its participation has been faced with a lot of problems especially in the area of manpower, training, and logistic. For its contributions to PSOs to be more effective, these problems need to be addressed.
1.2 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
It is an established fact that Nigerian Armed forces has been in the fore front of preventing and resolving conflicts. This is done through PSOs globally, regionally and sub-regional since Nigeria’s independence in 1960.
Experience from ECOMOG operations in Liberia and Sierra –Leone as well as the United Nation Assistance Mission in Darfur (UNAMID) and reports of other operations like United Nations Operations in Congo (ONUC) and United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL), it is evident that the problems of manpower, training and logistics are the major bane confronting NA personnel in PSOs.
Based on the foregoing, this study shall seek to proffer answers to the following:
a. What is the relationship between PSO and the NA?
b. What are the challenges encountered by the NA personnel in PSOs?
c. What are the prospects of NA personnel in PSOs?
1.3 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
The main objective of this study is to assess the problems and prospects of the NA personnel in PSOs by seeking to:
a. Examine the relationship between PSO and the NA.
b. Ascertain the challenges of NA personnel in PSOs.
c. Examine the prospects of NA personnel in PSOs.
1.4 RESEARCH ASSUMPTION
There has been a conventional notion that Nigeria’s participation in PSOs has given her political and economic hegemony in West Africa sub-region and Africa at large.
Despite logistics and manpower problems faced by the NA personnel in PSOs, it has been able to restore, stabilize and maintain peace globally, regionally and sub-regional through her involvement in PSOs.
1.5 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
This study will attempt to come up with a comprehensive analysis of NA in PSOs. It would help to further contribute to the existing knowledge on NA in PSOs. Its findings would assist policy makers at the defence and services headquarters, security organisations such as Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA) and State Security Service (SSS) in building their intelligence database. It will assist the National Assembly in the formulation of national security policy.
The study will serve as a veritable material for students and researchers who may want to carry out further research on the challenges and prospects of NA personnel in PSOs.
1.6 SCOPE OF THE STUDY
The participation of the NA in PSOs in Africa has helped to ensure peace among nations within the continent. This research work shall reflect other scholarly work on the prospects and challenges of NA personnel in PSOs. It shall take into cognisance the role of NA personnel in PSOs from 1990 to date as it relates to the security of Africa. This work shall use primary and secondary sources of materials.
1.7 LIMITATION OF THE STUDY
This research work will be hindered by some limitations. The key ones will be the use of secondary data to analyse the concept of PSO. Although the data to be used will be derived from reputable individuals and organisations, the authenticity of their findings might not be insulated from bias.
The concept of PSO is intangible. Hence, the empirical testing of the concepts may be relatively impossible. However this shall not affect the quality of research carried out and the outcomes of the findings.
HOW TO RECEIVE PROJECT MATERIAL(S)
After paying the appropriate amount (#5,000) into our bank Account below, send the following information to
08068231953 or 08168759420
(1) Your project topics
(2) Email Address
(3) Payment Name
(4) Teller Number
We will send your material(s) after we receive bank alert
BANK ACCOUNTS
Account Name: AMUTAH DANIEL CHUKWUDI
Account Number: 0046579864
Bank: GTBank.
OR
Account Name: AMUTAH DANIEL CHUKWUDI
Account Number: 3139283609
Bank: FIRST BANK
FOR MORE INFORMATION, CALL:
08068231953 or 08168759420